![]() |
| Fair is foul and foul is fair! |
Bates is sprung! (Somewhat anticlimactically.) But he has a spring in his step as he and Anna walk amongst the cottages to scout out potential new digs. Thomas the Usurper is still attending to Lord G, who tells Bates to “Stay in bed! Read books!” Jolly good all-purpose advice, if you ask us!
Lady Edith and the newspaper editor are getting along famously. He likes both her and her column on the plight of veterans. Hmmmmm ... perchance Lady Mary is not the only Crawley girl who can bewitch a denizen of Fleet Street in quest of a potential mate. But wait: she's sleuthing on the phone and finding out disquieting info. (What is this convenient dirt-digging service she's using?)
As is her wont, National Treasure Maggie Smith as the Dowager Countess wins the acting smackdown hands down. (Those droll faces! That dry martini delivery!) As The Guardian's tv critic puts it, “You can give her the worst lines imaginable and they still come out like Shakespeare.”
Housemaid turned prostitute turned cook Ethel: “These days a working woman must have a skill."
Cousin Violet: “But you seem to have so many...”
Ethel gets to stop being the elephant in the room thanks to the well-meaning machinations of Lady Violet, securing a place near her son where she can see him sometimes by pretending to be a former nanny. But not before Vi accuses Mrs Crawley of “surrounding us with a miasma of scandal.” Not fair! How about Lady Mary and the Turkish gent?![]() |
| No more tea and strumpets at the Crawley house. |
![]() |
| How would the plot chug along without Lady Violet? |
“Human nature is a funny business, isn't it?" muses Carson. Mrs Hughes: “Oh, why didn't the poets come to you? They'd have saved themselves an awful lot of time and trouble.” Snap!
![]() |
| “It feels like the outer circle of Dante’s Inferno,” Matthew calls the jazz club. No, dude, that would be the eternal wrangling over running the estate! |




What was Lady Edith using to find out info on the editor? Seems like the telephone version of googling someone. She's such a stalker.
ReplyDeleteOne blogger said she called the Daily Telegraph. I guess they kept dirt on people? The fact that she's "Lady Edith" got fast results, no doubt.
DeleteI'm sure a newspaper editor at that time was considered high enough on the social ladder to have public information available. I was confused about it myself, but I guess marital status would be public knowledge (it sure seems like everyone in Europe knows the marital status of the Crawley girls).
DeleteI was thinking the same exact thing!! They were still working out the wrinkles of that whole phone thing:) Strangely, as I never thought it'd happen, I've come to really like Thomas. He's undergone a Snape-like transition (Harry Potter nerd reference)...
ReplyDeleteI never thought I would like Thomas either after mid-first season! It was so hard because I felt so bad for him when they made it clear he was gay, but then he had to go be so evil! But now he's definitely winning me back bit by bit.
DeleteI agree with your Snape comparison, Sir Fink!
so will the war between O'Brien and Thomas now go nuclear?
ReplyDeletelooks like it ... everyone is wonderin' why she has such an extreme animus against him!!
DeleteI am not far enough into Downton Abbey to really comment but I love the last photo you posted of the three clubbin'
ReplyDeleteI don't know from Downton Abbey, but I know Dante's Inferno, and there are no paper lanterns in the first circle, where the virtuous non-Christians were placed.
ReplyDeleteMatthew should heed the advice to read books.
Fellowes was a Cambridge man who studies English lit ... which one might think would include a modicum of Dante. I agree, he shouldn't be bandying Inferno references about willy nilly! Please do tell us in what circle Dante placed the sodomites? Carson will want to beat Thomas about the head with that prospect!
DeleteThe Sodomites, one of whom had been Dante's teacher while living, were condemned to walk ceaselessly the burning sand of the seventh circle.
ReplyDeleteIt is possible the author meant to cast Matthew as a lout who lacked the discretion to keep his ignorance of Dante under wraps.
I'm wondering--if you were Matthew's date, and he pompously emitted a whopper, would you point it out to him politely, make a scathing sarcastic remark that would leave burn marks on his ears, or ignore it?
DeleteAnd would you consider a second date with such a clod?